<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3 Uses Far Less Memory Than Other Browsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clarionfolk.com/2008/03/13/firefox-3-uses-far-less-memory-than-other-browsers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clarionfolk.com/2008/03/13/firefox-3-uses-far-less-memory-than-other-browsers/</link>
	<description>Making Development Better Than Eating Icecream</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:36:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What Tool Do You Use For Reading Newsgroups? &#8212; Clarion Folk</title>
		<link>http://clarionfolk.com/2008/03/13/firefox-3-uses-far-less-memory-than-other-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>What Tool Do You Use For Reading Newsgroups? &#8212; Clarion Folk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarionfolk.com/2008/03/13/firefox-3-uses-far-less-memory-than-other-browsers/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] I then tried Thunderbird for a while. There were some _slight_ searching improvements, but not really enough. I really wanted to use Thunderbird, mostly because it&#8217;s from Mozilla, who make the wonderful Firefox (soon to be better). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I then tried Thunderbird for a while. There were some _slight_ searching improvements, but not really enough. I really wanted to use Thunderbird, mostly because it&#8217;s from Mozilla, who make the wonderful Firefox (soon to be better). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
